Some sportswriters seem to have responsibility to write about possible links of the Pittsburgh Steelers and steroids

When it is proclaimed that the Pittsburgh Steelers are going to play, sportswriters seem to be responsible to write about their connections with steroids. They try to create a steroid scandal and to determine any supposed links of this team with it.
Mike Fish of ESPN showed the same attitude, when this team played in the 2009 Super Bowl. Thisjournalist turned to have luck in writing news related to the Steelers and steroids.
Although sportswriters are not always lucky, when it comes to allegations of a team or a sportsperson with performance-enhancing drugs before a competition, the situation is altered, if it is spoken about the Pittsburgh Steelers. Reporters prefer writing about their history, about the lesson connected with anabolic steroids which took place in 1970s.
David Fleming wrote about historical lessons of this team before a game between the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Green Bay Packers. This sportswriter noted about time, when the NFL hadn’t yet banned application of steroids. Thus, according to several sources, players of the Pittsburgh Steelers applied steroids in the late 1970s. It is written in the 1991 book “False Glory: The Steve Courson Story” that more than 70 % of the offensive linemen of the Pittsburgh Steelers applied steroids.
It must have been true but it is necessary to understand that steroid use was not banned. Why are the Pittsburgh Steelers condemned, if steroid use was permitted?
Jim Haslett told the New Orleans Saints that the Pittsburgh Steelers had won a lot if times in 1970s and in 1980s because of steroids. According to this coach, the football players of the team became much more powerful due to steroids.
But it is important to be cautious here. The Pittsburgh Steelers were not the first football team that applied steroids and other medicines which possess performance-enhancing effects. There were other professional football teams that took steroids even in well-organized way.
Matt Chaneygave the better explanation related to intake of steroids in football. He wrote in his book “The Spiral of Denial: Muscle Doping in American football” that the Steelers were not responsible for the steroid revolution in football. There was another team that was responsible for this aspect. The San Diego Charges took steroids before the Pittsburgh Steelers in 1960s.
However the Steelers took steroids in 1970s, it is impossible to suggest that they won due to steroids. There were also players of other teams who applied these medications as well. Nevertheless, the Steelers were successful!