Bruce Goldberger in hearing related to Roger Clemens: Inadequate ways are used by anti-doping agencies

Testimonies of the famous toxicologist Bruce Goldberger will probably impact essentially on decision of the court in the case connected with Roger Clemens. Bruce Goldberger is the Professor of Pathology and Director of Toxicology at the University of Florida College of Medicine. This specialist didn’t testify on behalf of the government. However he was invited in order to replace Don Catlin, the director of the WADA UCLA Medicine, Goldberger’s testimonies didn’t correspond to those which are ordinarily presented by anti-doping organizations. He testified on behalf of the accused baseball player.
Bruce Goldberger has gotten his celebrity due to his appearing on different news programs. Even during such programs he doesn’t refrain from critical words. Bruce Goldberger criticized several anti-doping agencies, including the WADA.
The toxicologist criticized feds in the case linked with Roger Clemens. They based on “beer can evidence” provided by McNamee to prove that Roger Clemens took steroids and HGH. Brian McNamee, the former personal trainer of this baseball player, provided a beer can containing utilized needles and syringes that had traces of such steroids, as Sustanon, Primobolan Depot and Deca Durabolin and were mixed allegedly with blood of Roger Clemens. The beer can was stored by McNamee more than 6 years. The toxicologist argued that such basis wasn’t reasonable.
Goldberger claimed that it was impossible to base on “beer can evidence”. He noted that the accusation couldn’t be proven because the theory of contamination could present.
Thus, Goldberger didn’t support the affirmations of the government. Earlier he also expressed criticism connected with evidence used by certain anti-doping organizations.
Several years ago Goldberger testified on behalf of Floyd Landis, an American celebrated cyclist, when this athlete appealed positives for steroids. A WADA-accredited lab located in France discovered traces of exogenous testosterone; T: E ratio and carbon isotope ratio tests were applied by the lab. Goldberger expressed similar words and criticism during the appeal connected with Floyd Landis.
Goldberger claimed during an interview that the WADA utilized inadequate ways and violated rights of athletes in order to reach the success in anti-doping programs.
Floyd Landis didn’t have success in his appeal and acknowledged that he had applied steroids, EPO and certain other related medications.
No one knows which results will be reached by Roger Clemens. Will the government prove that he has lied before the Congress? Will he admit to taking prohibited drugs? Or will be the results contrary?