The National Football League sentenced to bans the linebacker D. J. Williams and Ryan McBean, a defensive lineman, of the team Denver Broncos for violation of steroid policy. These players were suspended from 6 games. But they were not banned for application of steroids. They didn’t test positive for steroids or other prohibited preparations. They were accused in providing “non-human” urine samples to the drug testing officer.
D. J. William said in an interview that he had never tested for any banned medicine during 8 years of his career. He noticed that he was proud of his records. The linebacker of the NFL mentioned that he was also proud of his manner in that he conducted himself, being an athlete.
Peter Schaffer, the defensive attorney for McBean, stated that the NFL had violated rights of this player. He mentioned that since McBean had never tested positive for any banned product, the NFL didn’t have any right to sentenced him to ban.
Peter Schaffer confirmed that he desired to make it clear that neither D. J. Williams, nor Ryan McBean tested positive for forbidden products.
A lawsuit was filed in Denver County Court against suspensions of these football players.
The players affirmed that the drug testing officer had violated certain rules linked with the procedure of collecting urine samples.
Peter Schaffer noted that some similarities had been between his client and Ryan Braun. Braun won his appeal related to his suspension from 50 games for intake of testosterone. Ryan Braun could prove that Dino Laurenzi, the drug testing officer, violated steroid policy.
As for Laurenzi, different anti-doping agencies defended and supported him. The WADA also supported him. It was confirmed that there was the same procedure of collecting and sending urine samples not only for the MLB but also for the WADA.
But as for the drug testing officer that collected samples of Williams and McBean, he was treated in another way. He was fired by the NFL for incorrect doing his duty.
At the hearing the NFL administrators acknowledged that the drug testing officer violated the rules linked with collection of urine samples.
Nonetheless, the appeal on behalf of the players was rejected.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий