Tom Verducci confirms that doping is not a moral question

The American sportswriter Tom Verducci explains about debates linked with rughts of steroid users to be chosen for the Baseball Hall of Fame. But as it generally happens, this explanation manifests only confusion of sportswriters about steroids.
The Baseball Writers Association of America (BWAA) is a professional association of baseball reporters that elect players for the National Baseball Hall of Fame. All reporters that are members of the BWAA already not less than 10 years have right to elect up to 10 players for the Hall of Fame.
Recently it was a debate between members of the BWAA. They discussed whether admitted or only suspected consumers of steroids and other prohibited medicines might entry into Cooperstown.
Members of the BWAA usually should comment their votes: they have to explain why they have voted pro or contra certain questions. Some of them confirm that doping destroys the integrity of sports and intake of prohibited medications is often considered by them to be immoral.
As for Tom Verducci, he doesn’t think that usage of steroids is necessarily a moral question. This American sportswriter assures that steroids help users to take unfair advantage over those who don’t use controlled substances. According to this sportswriter, performance-enhancing drugs make competitions unfair. So, usage of forbidden preparations promotes unfairness in sports. That’s why Verducci denies any connection between doping and morality. This sportswriter confirms that it is a question that is linked with performance but not to morality. So, this writer suggests that steroid users must not be allowed to be in the Hall of Fame. But he has voted for Jeff Bagwell, an admitted steroid user. This athlete has acknowledged that he had administrated androstenedione. It is necessary to note that this medicine was not classified as an anabolic steroid, when Bagwell administrated it. According to the Control Act 2004, it is enumerated among banned medicines. Since it wasn’t legally considered to be a steroid, Verducci decided to vote for the consumer of this medicine; however, it was always named an anabolic-androgenic steroid by specialists. Furthermore, it was said that Bagwell just became bigger but didn’t promote his performance due to intake of androstenedione.
Nonetheless, the decision of Tom Verducci to vote for the admitted consumer of the steroid is quite controversial. The following question appears: “Maybe Tom Verducci is not against usage of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs by sportspersons?” Since Verducci doesn’t agree that intake of steroids is a moral question, he may suggest that enhancement of performance is not a real problem.
Numerous persons suppose that intake of steroids represents evil because they are illegal.